Skip to main content

A year of debate in Birmingham - press release

250 years ago Birmingham could quite correctly be described as the centre for debate in Britain. The Lunar Society was in full swing, clubs and meetings debating science, religious freedom and radical politics were going on all over the city, in taverns, coffee houses and inns. The radical fervour of the period saw riots and battles in the street between conservatives and supporters of the French revolution which James Watt described as “dividing Birmingham into two parties who hated one another mortally”.

The city, during this period, has been described as having ‘freedom built into it’s self-image’, making Birmingham the place to settle for radical dissenters from all over the country. It all came to an end rather abruptly when Joseph Priestley (of the Lunar Society) was forced to flee the city following a full scale riot at his house in protest at a dinner he was giving to celebrate the second anniversary of the storming the Bastille (It is thought these rioters were in the pay of conservative city officials).

The Birmingham of today is a little quieter but recently the city’s history of debate has had something of a revival.

Cafe scientifique meet once a month to discuss issues in science and research, providing a valuable insight into the workings of science practice and debunking some common misunderstandings. For someone like me who doesn’t know his Periodic Table from his Bunsen burner, a night in the pub with these popularisers of science is an education.

Skeptics in the pub meet twice a month at the Queen Victoria to contemplate the meaning of life through a variety of issues. Birmingham Humanists have had some very interesting debates this year, and after an absence of over 200 years the Lunar Society set up again a few years ago to continue the tradition of the original dissenters.

Last month also saw the first birthday of the Birmingham Salon. Inspired by the Institute of Ideas' annual debating festival The Battle of Ideas which takes place in London in October each year. It was formed in the belief that Birmingham needs the same channels for intellectual debate. Each salon meeting is led by expert speakers and involves anyone who is interested.

“Our aim to get away from the stale affairs so often witnessed on Question Time or Any Questions, where adversarial politicians engage in point scoring and one-upmanship. The salon aims to get to the bottom of controversial ideas. We try to attract an audience who are prepared to challenge speakers, and be challenged themselves by new ideas, so we have a genuine public conversation. If this approach upsets some apple carts and challenges some orthodoxies all the better”, said Jason Smith, the salon’s organiser.

Over the last 12 months Birmingham has had open public debates on ‘What is the new Birmingham library for?’, ‘Is Childhood in Crisis?’, ‘Therapeutic culture: are we all on the depression spectrum?’, ‘Can Aids medicine work forever?’ and a ‘History of tattooing’, as well as many others.

The Lunar men and others of that period saw debate as integral to democracy. Voting every 4 or 5 years was the technical bit, debating and having a personal commitment to seek the truth was the actual practice of democracy. Active citizens were the key to the future. Perhaps Birmingham is again starting to find it’s radical voice.


Popular posts from this blog

Drink, smoke, eat: prohibition today

I am producing and chairing this discussion on our changing attitudes towards personal pleasure as part of the Battle of Ideas Festival at the Barbican Centre, London.

Drink, smoke, eat: prohibition today
Sunday 21 October, 5.00pm until 6.15pm, Garden Room Under the Spotlight

Are we entering a new prohibitionist era? Drinking and even smoking are still perfectly legal, but there is a palpable sense that they are less acceptable than they once were. Cigarettes have become far more expensive thanks to punitive taxes, and the authorities would like to do something similar with alcohol. The spread of ‘no drinking’ zones in public places also seems to follow the pattern of smoking bans, which now cover every indoor public space and many outdoor ones too. So are we witnessing prohibition by stealth? Instead of banning certain activities, is the state trying render them socially unacceptable?

Putting smokers beyond the social pale certainly seemed to be health secretary Andrew Lansley’s obje…

Life is a Dream by Birmingham Opera Co.

Two members of Birmingham Salon are taking part in Birmingham Opera Company's next production, the world premiere of Life is a Dream by composer, Jonathan Dove and writer, Alasdair Middleton. They have created a brand new, full length opera and they've used a legendary play by 17th century Spanish Playwright, Calderón. Artistic Director, Graham Vick, designer Samal Blak, and William Lacey from Leipzig Opera are in charge. Singers include British tenor, Paul Nilon as the King, Wendy Dawn Thompson (mezzo), Keel Watson (bass), Donna Bateman (soprano). They'll be joined by American tenor, Joseph Guyton who played Cassio in Othello and is a finalist in Germany's X Factor. Playing the role of Segismund is American baritone, Eric Greene.
One member of the chorus, Niall Crowley, wrote this piece 
for Independent about the production and the company:

Opera for the masses, by the masses?
By Niall Crowley In a disused tin-plate factory in a backstreet of Digbeth in Birmingham, an extra…

Have we got copyright wrong?

Next Birmingham Salon: Have we got copyright wrong? 7.30pm Thursday 13th September at The Ropewalk, 15-20 St Paul’s Square, Birmingham B3 1QU

Is copyright a principle that is impossible to maintain in the modern world where reproduction is almost effortless? Should we take a pragmatic line and formulate alternative licensing and business models that are adaptive to the new realities of the digital age? Or should we, make a stand against the devaluation of works of art and entertainment as freebies, and defend the notion of social creations deserving of reward and accreditation? And as the British government prepares to make publicly available scientific research for everyone to read for free, are there separate principles involved in research literature on the one hand and artistic works on the other?